In the context of special relativity, groups always refer to a defining set of transformations to an inertial grid. There are 4 basic kinds of transformations from one inertial grid to another:
Somewhat confusingly, the jargon related to the groups used in special relativity varies among authors.
As a good starting point, here are the definitions used by Steven Weinberg in his book Quantum Theory of Fields. Be warned that other variations exist.
|Displacement in space-time||y||n||-|
|Reflection in space-time (P, T)||y||y||n|
|Reorientation in space||y||y||y|
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol I:
According to Weinberg, the full Poincaré Group corresponds to the full set of transformations that leave dxidxi invariant. It has 10 continuous parameters: 4 for translation, 6 for space-time reorientations. The previous statement leaves out the discrete symmetries of P and T. The space-time reorientations can be broken down into 3 space reorientations, and 3 boosts.
According to Weinberg, the topology of Minkowski space-time is R(4) x R(3) x S(3)/Z2, and its doubly-connected. Here, S(3)/Z2 is the 3-sphere, but with opposite points identified.
|Displacement in space-time||y||y||y|
|Reflection in space-time (P, T)||n||n||n|
|Reorientation in space||y||y||y|
Two groups related to the Poincaré Group:
The Conformal Space-Time Group contains the Poincaré Group as a subgroup. It's defined by insisting that only light-like intervals are invariant. It transforms a light cone into itself, and leaves the speed limit invariant. More generally, it preserves light-like, time-like, and space-like separations (causal structure). It has 15 parameters. In this case, dxidxi is in general proportional, but not equal, between grids. (I think the "constant" of proportionality is allowed to vary across space-time.) Geometrically, conformal transformations always preserve angles. "The maximal spacetime symmetry group of massless particles is the conformal group. (link)"
The ISL(2,C) group is a covering group of the Poincaré Group. It leads to spinors, which are, I believe, a generalization of tensors.
In geometrodynamics, knowledge of the light-cone goes most of the way towards giving you the metric - what's missing is a conformal factor that varies from event to event.
Weinberg defines the Lorentz Transformation to be the full affine form, with no restriction on reflections. Other authors exclude displacements and/or reflections from being included in what they call Lorentz Transformations. So the definition of what exactly constitutes a Lorentz Transformation varies between authors.
Many physicists refer to affine transformations (which include displacements) as linear transformations. Mathematicians would never do that.
In his 1972 book Gravitation and Cosmology, Weinberg does not use the term orthochronous. Instead, he uses the term proper to refer to both P and T.
The non-continuous transformations P and T seem to have a special status. Some fundamental interactions in physics are P-invariant and T-invariant, but others are not.
Some other group names that I've seen (again, this may vary between authors):
|Displacement in space-time||n||n||n||y||n|
|Reflection in space P||y||n||n||n||n|
|Reflection in time T||y||y||n||n||n|
|Rotation in space||y||y||y||n||y|
SL(2,C) are 2x2 complex matrices with det=+1, 3 complex params and 6 real params. SL(2,C) is a covering group of the Homogeneous Lorentz Group O(1,3).
U(n) are nxn Hermitian (inverse = conjugate) matrices.
SU(n) are nxn Hermitian matrices with det=+1.
SU(2) is a double-cover of SO(3).
Wikipedia: "A Lie group G is said to be simply connected if every loop in G can be shrunk continuously to a point in G.... An example of a simply connected group is the special unitary group SU(2), which as a manifold is the 3-sphere. The rotation group SO(3), on the other hand, is not simply connected. (See Topology of SO(3).) The failure of SO(3) to be simply connected is intimately connected to the distinction between integer spin and half-integer spin in quantum mechanics."
In a chat with Eric Weinstein, Roger Penrose talks about a connection between relativistic aberration, 2-spinors, and conformal transformations of the Riemann sphere onto itself (stereographic projection). This relates to the Penrose paper about the invariance of circular outlines of objects, as the intersection of a past light cone of a detector with an object's history. That circularity apparently has as its source the same math of the stereographic projection. It might be useful to note that a circular outline is an invariant property, since there don't seem to be many invariant properties in optics.
Link: "The double cover of the Poincaré group is the fundamental spacetime symmetry of modern physics and is a crucial component of the standard model of particle physics."
"The Hilbert space of one-particle states is always an irreducible representation space of the Poincare group... T he construction of the unitary irreducible representations of the Poincare group is probably the most successful part of special relativity (in particle physics, not in gravitation theory, for which it is a disaster). It permits us to classify all kinds of particles and implies the main conservation laws (energy-momentum and angular momentum)."